<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What are we going to do with(out) social media?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shesaywhat.com/180/without-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shesaywhat.com/180/without-social-media/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:00:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lia N.</title>
		<link>http://shesaywhat.com/180/without-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Lia N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shesaywhat.com/?p=180#comment-4</guid>
		<description>@Elizabeth, I think that&#039;s a very valid point, and a strong counter to the popular argument that print media is dead. Aside from fitting into the comfortable cliché of opening up a newspaper while having a morning coffee, printed news still has extensive value. I think IDEO did a great job of pointing out that tangible media would benefit from being more dynamic, but right now our society associates dynamism with live updates from the internet – and then you have the same problem of being dependent on the internet to deliver your news. It&#039;s a fascinating problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Elizabeth, I think that&#8217;s a very valid point, and a strong counter to the popular argument that print media is dead. Aside from fitting into the comfortable cliché of opening up a newspaper while having a morning coffee, printed news still has extensive value. I think IDEO did a great job of pointing out that tangible media would benefit from being more dynamic, but right now our society associates dynamism with live updates from the internet – and then you have the same problem of being dependent on the internet to deliver your news. It&#8217;s a fascinating problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://shesaywhat.com/180/without-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shesaywhat.com/?p=180#comment-2</guid>
		<description>But couldn&#039;t this same thought be applied to news before the internet?  Whenever you have only one place to go for news, you&#039;re in trouble, but I think we&#039;re getting more diverse places to go for news, not fewer.  Like, imagine - what if all we had for our news was newspapers?  The printing presses could break, couldn&#039;t they?   If you get your news only from one forum, you&#039;re taking a risk, whether that forum is the internet, or newspapers, or TV, or NPR, or what have you.  Luckily, in this day and age, we&#039;ve got loads of places to turn for the news - not just the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But couldn&#8217;t this same thought be applied to news before the internet?  Whenever you have only one place to go for news, you&#8217;re in trouble, but I think we&#8217;re getting more diverse places to go for news, not fewer.  Like, imagine &#8211; what if all we had for our news was newspapers?  The printing presses could break, couldn&#8217;t they?   If you get your news only from one forum, you&#8217;re taking a risk, whether that forum is the internet, or newspapers, or TV, or NPR, or what have you.  Luckily, in this day and age, we&#8217;ve got loads of places to turn for the news &#8211; not just the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

